Legal Opinion

Duskin v. Carlson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1998No. 65998-2PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

965 P.2d 611 (1998)

136 Wash.2d 550

Gordon Gary DUSKIN and L. Marie Duskin, Respondents,

v.

Kenneth CARLSON and Jane Doe Carlson, and their marital community; and the Department of Labor and Industries of the State of Washington, Petitioners.

No. 65998-2.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued June 23, 1998.

Decided October 1, 1998.

McLean & Trichak, Kent T. Van Den Berg, Christine Gregoire, Attorney General, Diane Cornell, Assistant Attorney General, Seattle, for Petitioners.

Bailey, Duskin & Jarvill, David E. Duskin, Arlington, for Respondents.

DOLLIVER, Justice.

The Washington State Department…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. City of Seattle v. MontanaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. City of Seattle v. MontanaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Martin v. MeierWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Nisqually Delta Ass'n v. City of DuPontWashington Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Washington State Republican Party v. Public Disclosure CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. B.S. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. Washington Cedar & Supply Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Washington Cedar & Supply Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Ryan v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API