Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Finley v. Barker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1922No. Docket No. 60PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Defendants are county officers of Van Burén county, Duncombe being county treasurer, Barker sheriff, and Chandler prosecuting attorney. Upon each duties are imposed in the administration and execution of Act No. 339, Pub. Acts 1919. In former years various so-called dog laws of the State and Territory of Michigan have been enacted from time to time, beginning as early as 1805, but this one the legislature introductorily declared in its section 1, “shall be known and may be cited as the dog law of nineteen hundred and nineteen of the State of Michigan.”

Plaintiff resided upon and owned a farm…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nicchia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Van Horn v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Mayor of Hagerstown v. WitmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  4. Julienne v. Mayor of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  5. State v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Ingham CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2005
  2. Bugai v. RickertMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Christopher v. BayntonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Youngblood v. Jackson CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API