Legal Opinion

Christopher v. Baynton

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1985No. Docket 74201PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Marsha Christopher was attacked by a dog while delivering mail in the City of Taylor. She suffered serious injuries and she and her husband filed this suit against Robert Baynton, the city’s pound master, the City of Taylor, and "John Doe I and II” alleging negligence, intentional tort, and nuisance. The trial court found that the City of Taylor and Robert Baynton were protected by governmental immunity and, therefore, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs appeal as of right.

We first consider whether the city’s activities in enforcing its animal control…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Parker v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Rosario v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Smith v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Randall v. Delta Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Canton TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Garcia v. City of JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Garcia v. City of JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API