Legal Opinion

Bugai v. Rickert

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 61, Calendar No. 36,113PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 5263, provides in part:

“Any dog that enters any field or enclosure, outside of an incorporated city, unaccompanied by his owner or his owner’s agent, shall constitute a private nuisance and the owner or tenant of such field or other enclosure, or his agent or servant, may kill such dog while it is in the field or other enclosure without liability for such killing.”

Defendant shot and killed plaintiff’s dog under precisely the circumstances set forth in the statute. Plaintiff brought suit. Defendant prevailed. Plaintiff has appealed, presenting the question that the statute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nicchia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Ten Hopen v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Finley v. BarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of DraperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. People v. YeoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Sekulovski v. Commerce TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API