Legal Opinion

Leggett v. Pridgen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1920No. 1591PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Habeas corpus. Before Judge Summerall. Coffee superior court. July 26, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

“ 1. An alleged statement of facts not being set forth in the bill of exceptions nor made a part of the same as an exhibit thereto and properly authenticated, what purports to be an agreed statement of facts sent up as a part of the record, but not approved by the judge and ordered filed as such, can not be considered by this court. Robinson v. Woodward, 134 Ga. 777 (68 S. E. 553) ; Blackman v. Garrett, 135 Ga. 226 (69 S. E. 110).

“ 2. The errors assigned in the bill of exceptions being such as can not be determined from the record without a consideration of such alleged agreed statement of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Silvey & Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Robinson v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Blackman v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Scott v. Wage Earners Loan & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Greenfield v. HarveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Town of Fairburn v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. State of Ga.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Wilcher v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. State Highway Department v. AttawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API