Legal Opinion

Wilcher v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 19, 1930No. 20040PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. “In the transcript sent up by the clerk as record, a paper which purports to. be a copy of an agreed statement of facts can not be considered as record, the same not having been approved by the trial judge and made a part of the record, where it only appears that such agreed statement was signed by counsel and filed in the office of the clerk.” Federal Investment Co. v. Ewing, 165 Ga. 435 (141 S. E. 65); Leggett v. Pridgen, 150 Ga. 115 (102 S. E. 822).

2. “As neither the copy nor any of the contents of the instrument can be considered as any part of the record, the bill of exceptions can…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Summerlin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Silvey & Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Robinson v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Federal Investment Co. v. EwingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Leggett v. PridgenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rabhan v. RabhanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Willcox v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. American Iron & Metal Co. v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API