Greenfield v. Harvey
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
“A statement in a bill of exceptions, that ‘plaintiff excepts to said verdict and judgment as being contrary to law.’ is not a valid assignment of error and will not be considered by this court.” Rodgers v. Black, 99 Ga. 142 (25 S. E. 20). Newberry v. Tenant. 121 Ga. 561 (49 S. E. 621). On reason and by analogy this .applies in a case where there is no verdict, but only a judgment rendered upon a submission to the judge without a jury to pass on all questions of law and fact.
(а) Accordingly, on final trial of a case for equitable relief involving issues of fact…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Tilley v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Newberry v. TenantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Callaway v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Wheeler v. WorleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Federal Land Bank v. Bank of LenoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Carpenter v. State Ex Rel. HainsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Vick v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of CoolidgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- City of Douglas v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Caldwell v. Commercial Investment Discount Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.