Legal Opinion

Scott v. Wage Earners Loan & Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 18, 1918No. 520PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Meldrim. Chatham superior court. July 19, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The issues of law and fact in an equity suit were, by consent of the parties, decided by the judge without the intervention of a jury. The judge decided in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff, without making a motion for a new trial, filed a direct bill of exceptions which did not, by exhibit or otherwise, set forth any evidence introduced at the hearing, but specified to be sent up to this court “article three of the charter or authority under which said defendant acted as a corporation.” The judge certified the bill of exceptions, and in his certificate recited that it “specifies all of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eubank v. Mayor of EastmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Pierce v. FeltsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Williams v. ChildersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Greenfield v. HarveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Leggett v. PridgenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  3. McBurnette v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Town of Fairburn v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  5. Willcox v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API