Legal Opinion

Roy v. Bachmann

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 18, 2010No. AC 30522PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

In this appeal, we must determine whether the exclusivity rule of the Workers’ Compensation Act1 (act); General Statutes § 31-275 et seq.; shields the owners of a parking lot that they leased to a corporation, in which they were majority stockholders and officers, from liability for damages arising from injuries sustained by an employee of the corporation during the course of her employment. The plaintiffs2 Anne Marie *222Roy and Steven Roy appeal from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Andrew G. Bachmann and Jane B. Bachmann.3 The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Blancato v. Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. Berko v. FredaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Connecticut Children's Medical Center Faculty Practice PlanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. Kumah v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. Rodriguez v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API