Legal Opinion

Berko v. Freda

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 9, 1983PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CLIFFORD, J.

In Krauth v. Geller, 31 N.J. 270 (1960), this Court adopted the so-called “fireman’s rule,” applicable in tort cases. That rule holds that because it is a firefighter's business to deal with the *83usual hazards involved in fighting fires, a firefighter “cannot complain of negligence in the creation of the very occasion for his engagement.” Krauth, supra, 31 N.J. at 273-74. The effect of the rule is to insulate one whose negligence causes a fire from liability for injuries sustained by a firefighter while extinguishing the blaze.

The specific…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wagner v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Krauth v. Israel Geller and Buckingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Walters v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Ridgefield Park Education Ass'n v. Ridgefield Park Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Brown v. United States Stove Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Kreski v. Modern Wholesale Electric Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Krause v. US Truck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. Roma v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  5. Pottebaum v. HindsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API