Legal Opinion
Tringali v. Vest
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 11, 1951No. Civ. 14735PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant in Monterey County. The complaint alleges that plaintiff has its offices in Monterey County, and that defendant is engaged in business in San Francisco, and sets forth two causes of action, one for a balance due upon a mutual, open and current account, the other for a balance due upon an account stated. Defendant moved for a change of venue to San Francisco, the county of his residence. The motion was denied, and defendant appeals.
The motion for a change of venue should have been granted. The first cause of action properly alleges a cause of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Jones v. WiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Crofts & Anderson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Block v. D. W. Nicholson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Hagan v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pacific Bal Industries v. Northern Timber, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Erwin v. Cee-Tee Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CO., INC. v. ChagnonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Garrett v. Superior Court of Kings Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967