Legal Opinion
Garrett v. Superior Court of Kings Cty.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1967No. Civ. No. 745PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
Utilizing the current means provided by section 400 of the Code of Civil Procedure to test the propriety of the order of the trial court, the defendant in action No. 18187, pending in Kings County, entitled “The Armstrong Rubber Company v. J. Earl Garrett, Jr., doing business as Jaybird Auto Center & Car Wash,” filed a petition for a writ of mandate to require the Kings County Superior Court to grant his application for a transfer of the case to his home county of Orange. (Henson v. Superior Court, 218 Cal.App.2d 327 [32 Cal.Rptr. 404] ; Cal-Ore Lumber Sales v. Russell, 133 Cal.App.2d 296…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Kaluzok v. BrissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Mercantile Trust Co. of S.F. v. DoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Willingham v. PecoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Crofts & Anderson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pesses v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Rycz v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022