Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard H. Thier
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 27, 1987No. 85-4857PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Chief Judge:
Appellant challenges a restraining order that barred any disposition of his assets pending the outcome of his trial for violating the Continuing Criminal Enterprise Statute (CCE). The bases of the order were (1) the grand jury’s declaration that it found the assets were forfeitable under CCE, and (2) the declaration of the prosecuting attorney that Thier was guilty of violating CCE, had profited from the violations, and had purchased the assets after the violations commenced. Because the district court failed to follow Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(b) and to consider Thier’s need for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Earl Edward Gandy v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Clarence Jay Crozier, Manuel Isadore Pine, Alan Terry Stein, and Florence Margaret WolkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Aaron Henry v. First National Bank of Clarksdale v. Mississippi Action for Progress, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp. v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Peter MonsantoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.