Loden v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.
Following a bench trial, a judge found Michael Loden guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol to the extent that he was a less safe driver. Loden appeals, contending the trial court erroneously concluded that Miranda warnings were not required because he was not “in custody” at the time of the field sobriety tests. We find no error and affirm Loden’s conviction.
Viewed in a light most favorable to support the judgment, the evidence shows that a trooper with the Georgia State Patrol observed Loden traveling at a high rate of speed. The trooper confirmed that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Polizzotto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Harmon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Doyle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Grodhaus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.