Legal Opinion

State v. Leviner

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 19, 1994No. A94A0499PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

The State appeals from the order of the trial court sustaining appellee/defendant Michael R. Leviner’s motion in limine and motion to exclude in this DUI case. Held:

1. A motion in limine is closely related to a motion to suppress. Ga. Crim. Trial Prac. (1993 ed.), § 14-52. The same appellate rules as to factfinding and witness credibility determination apply in both types of hearings. “ ‘ “ ‘Factual and credibility determinations made by a trial judge after a suppression hearing [or a motion in limine hearing to exclude evidence] are accepted by appellate courts…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. City of Jesup v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  3. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  4. Bibb County v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  5. Keenan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Allenbrand v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Morrissette v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. State v. KirbabasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. State v. TerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Jordan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API