Legal Opinion
Vandergriff v. City of Chattanooga
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided March 31, 1998No. 1:95-cv-00293PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
COLLIER, District Judge.
In this action, Plaintiffs challenge the legality and constitutionality of the Chattanooga Storm Water Ordinance (“the Ordinance”). The matter proceeded to trial without a jury on April 23, 1997, and concluded on April 24,1997. The Court heard testimony from seven witnesses: Tom Scott, Mayor Gene Roberts, Kevin Heston, Robert Day, Jack Marcellis, Daisy Warren Madison, and Peter Yakimowieh. Having reviewed the testimony of the witnesses, considered the exhibits introduced at trial, the arguments and pleadings of counsel, and the applicable law, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Norbert C. Pearson, Also Known as Spike v. City of Grand Blanc, J. Larry TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Clark v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- Hawley v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of MobileDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2001
- Heyne v. METROPOLITAN NASHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLSDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009
- Tennessee Commercial Roe Fishermen's Association v. Tennessee Wildlife Resources CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016