Legal Opinion

City of Chattanooga v. Davis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 2001PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM M. BARKER, J„ delivered the opinion of the court, in which E. RILEY ANDERSON, C.J., and FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, Jr., and JANICE M. HOLDER, JJ., joined.

The primary issue presented by these consolidated cases is whether Article VI, section 14 of the Tennessee Constitution, which prohibits the laying of fines in excess of fifty dollars unless assessed by a jury, applies to proceedings for the violation of a municipal ordinance. We hold that Article VI, section 14 does apply to such proceedings when either the intended purpose or the actual purpose or effect of the…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Flautt & Mann v. Council of City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  2. Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose LLC v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. City of Memphis, Tennessee v. Tre Hargett, Secretary of StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  4. City of Brentwood v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  5. Jordan v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2007

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API