Legal Opinion
Borgerding v. Village of Freeport
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 19, 1926No. 25,123PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, O. J.
This is an appeal from an order continuing a restraining order preventing the village of Freeport from letting a contract for paving.
The village was organized pursuant to L. 1885, p. 148, c. 145. By section 30 a petition for such improvement must be signed by at least a majority of all the owners of real estate bounding both sides, and of the owners of at least half the frontage, of such street or part of street to be improved:
The village of Freeport never voted to come under chapter 9 R. L. 1905, and hence section 735 thereof as now amended, L. 1925, p. 391, c. 309, is not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Washington v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- State ex rel. Lum v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Messick v. DubyOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- State ex rel. St. Paul Gaslight Co. v. McCardySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Petters & Co. v. ViegelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- State v. Northwest Linseed Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- New York Life Insurance v. Village of MapletonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Heidrich v. HeffelfingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.