Legal Opinion
Petters & Co. v. Viegel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 14, 1926No. 25,229PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
Plaintiff is a corporation organized for the purposes mentioned in G. S. 1923, § 7436. It issued and sold bonds secured under a trust agreement, which provided for the deposit, as security therefor, of Minnesota and North Dakota tax certificates. It complied with the requirements of the State Securities Act, commonly known as the Blue Sky Law, but not with those of G. S. 1923, § 7437-7439. It held a license from the Securities Commission authorizing it to sell its bonds.
Defendant, as superintendent of banks, proposes to exercise the supervisory powers conferred upon him by G. S. 1923,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Board of Courthouse & City Hall Com'rs v. CooleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- State ex rel. Douglas v. WestfallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State ex rel. Flaten v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State v. ElliottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- School Districts Nos. 61 v. School District No. 93Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hoff v. First State Bank of WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Liquidation of Farmers State Bank of North BranchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928