Spencer v. Duncan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action to compel the defendant to account for and pay certain moneys alleged to have been received by him and held in trust for the plaintiff.
The cause was tried by the court, written findings filed establishing the trust relation, and finding that there was due to plaintiff the sum of $1,071.85, with interest at seven per cent per annum from May 1, 1870, for which sum judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the judgment, and the cause comes up on the judgment-roll.
Two errors are assigned by appellant.
1. That the findings do not fix the precise…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bleven v. FreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Davis v. BaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Miller v. HickenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Helm v. DumarsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
- Kidd v. TeepleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bohn v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Lange v. WatersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- California Medical Assn. v. BrianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Butler v. AgnewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Hunter v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.