Legal Opinion
In re Comair Air Disaster Litigation
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided November 8, 1983No. 79-104PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERTELSMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Comair’s motion to compel production of an internal accident report, prepared by the defendant Piper Aircraft Corporation (Piper). Production is resisted on the grounds of work product. Resolution of the motion requires the court to interpret F.R.Ev. 612.
FACTS
This dispute arises from the crash of Comair’s Piper “Navajo” aircraft on October 8, 1979, at the Greater Cincinnati International Airport located in this district. Comair has sued Piper on a general negligence theory as to the adequacy of Piper’s warnings to Navajo…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
- Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Barrer v. Women's National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
3Cited by11 opinions
- Margaret Hall Foundation, Inc. v. StrongDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- United States v. 22.80 Acres of LandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
- Coryn Group II, LLC v. O.C. Seacrets, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Derderian v. Polaroid Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- In re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.