Margaret Hall Foundation, Inc. v. Strong
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AND IDENTIFICATION AND PRODUCTION OF MATERIALS REVIEWED BY DEFENDANTS IN PREPARATION FOR THEIR DEPOSITIONS
SKINNER, District Judge.
The parties in this securities fraud action are in the midst of a consolidated discovery process. Presently before the court is a motion by plaintiffs to compel deposition testimony and the identification and production of certain documents. Plaintiffs’ motion encompasses three separate issues. First, plaintiffs ask that I compel defendant Strong to testify as to what documents he reviewed in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Garner v. WolfinbargerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In re Kidder Peabody Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Moskowitz v. LoppDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Sandberg v. Virginia Bankshares, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Wells Dairy, Inc. v. American Industrial Refrigeration, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Ivers v. Keene Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.