Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ROSZKOWSKI, District Judge.
-I. ALLIED’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
Defendant-Counterplaintiff, Allied Tube and Conduit Corporation (“Allied”), seeks an order from this Court compelling plaintiff, Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corporation (“Wheeling-Pittsburgh”), to produce certain documents for inspection and photocopying pursuant to Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Wheeling-Pittsburgh resists production of said documents on the ground that they are protected from discovery by the attorney-client privilege. For the reasons stated herein, we grant Allied’s request and direct…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- La Chemise Lacoste v. Alligator Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- Bailey v. Meister Brau, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Harry Needelman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
- Intermedics, Inc. v. Ventritex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1991
- Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. Twin Laboratories Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Baker v. CNA InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1988
- Laxalt v. McClatchyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.