Legal Opinion

Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 1, 1977No. 73 Civ. 424PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

FRANKEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Berkey Photo, Inc., has charged defendant, Eastman Kodak Company, with violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. By order of October 29,1976, the court referred all remaining discovery matters in this case and its companion case, GAF Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Company, D.C.N.Y., 73 Civ. 1893 (MEF), to Magistrate Sol Schreiber “to determine * * * whenever possible, or, if necessary, to hear and report.” The result has been, as expected, a course of crisp, efficient management of pretrial proceedings bringing us now close to the eve of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Victor Decosta v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  3. Mcleod v. Business Machine And Office Appliance Mechanics Conference BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Acme Highway Products Corporation v. The D. S. Brown Company and Delmont D. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Garcia v. PeeplesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. MorelliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  5. Karn v. RandDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API