Legal Opinion

In Re Domestic Partnership of Ellis

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 2008No. G038437PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

Introduction

We hold: Under the California Domestic Partner Rights and Responsibilities Act of 2003 (Stats. 2003, ch. 421) (the Domestic Partner Act), and consistent with the rationale of our Supreme Court in Koebke v. Bernardo Heights Country Club (2005) 36 Cal.4th 824 [31 Cal.Rptr.3d 565, 115 P.3d 1212] (Koebke), a person’s reasonable, good faith belief that his or her domestic partnership was validly registered with the California Secretary of State entitles that person to the rights and responsibilities of a registered domestic partner, even if the registration never took…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Vallera v. ValleraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Koebke v. Bernardo Heights Country ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Estate of Derrel Depasse v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Armijo v. MilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ceja v. Rudolph & Sletten, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Burnham v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Konou v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Estate of Issa CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Ferry v. De Longhi America Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API