Legal Opinion

Worden v. Assiff

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1947No. Docket No. 62, Calendar No. 43,459PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

Plaintiffs and defendants’ are the owners or vendees under land contracts of adjoining homes on Bement street in the city of Lansing. A dispute arose between them as to the boundary line between their respective lots, where a joint graveled driveway had been in use for many years. Plaintiffs erected a fence on what they claim is their own property on their side of the line, but where the, defendants claim it interferes with their right to use the driveway which they claim has been established by user and adverse possession. Plaintiffs filed this bill in chancery to enjoin the defendants from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Cecelia Society v. Universal Car & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Burling v. LeiterMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Wilkinson v. HutzelMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Hopkins v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Village of Manchester v. BlaessMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Plymouth Canton Community Crier, Inc v. ProseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Alstad v. BoyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Wood v. DentonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Banach v. LaweraMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Rannels v. MarxMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API