Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. Hutzel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1906No. Docket No. 45PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Bill by Emma O. Wilkinson against Charles J. Hutzel, Matilda A. Hutzel, and William Copeland 'to restrain an encroachment upon a right of way. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Complainant, who is the owner of lot 12 in block 5, south of Huron street, range 7 east of Ann Arbor Land Company’s addition to the city of Ann Arbor, *675and claims a private right of way 10 feet wide between said lot and lot 11 next south thereof, one-half of which right of way is over and upon the north 5 feet of said lot 11, filed her bill of complaint asking that defendants Hutzel, who own and occupy lot 11, and defendant Copeland, their contractor and builder, be enjoined from obstructing, •excavating, and building upon the north 5 feet of said lot, thereby destroying said right of way. She…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. KirklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  2. Plymouth Canton Community Crier, Inc v. ProseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Zemon v. NetzorgMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Alstad v. BoyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Stewart v. HuntMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API