Legal Opinion
Craemer v. Drake
California Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1940No. L. A. No. 16682; L. A. No. 16699PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
In the case of In re Pacific Coast Building-Loan Association, L. A. No. 16540 (ante, p. 134 [99 Pac. (2d) 251]), this day decided, the Building and Loan Commissioner, as liquidator of Pacific Coast Building-Loan Association, petitioned the superior court for instructions concerning the ranking of claims of investment certificate holders and membership shareholders of the association. His petition showed that investment certificate holders had been or would be paid the principal of their claims in full, and a question had arisen as to whether they should be paid interest thereon for the period…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Drapeau v. Custodians of Telluride Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- County of Tulare v. City of DinubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Alemany v. WensingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fletcher v. A. J. Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- City and County of San Francisco v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Adams v. California Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Eggert v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. Worldwide Church of God, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.