Adams v. California Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
These consolidated actions, like the Martin case, S. F. No. 16004, ante, p. 478 [116 Pac. (2d) 71], this day decided, present the question whether the plaintiffs, as holders of mutual shares and thrift accounts in the defendant California Mutual Building and Loan Association, are entitled to share in liquidation as creditors on a parity with the holders of investment certificates. The history of the association and the other facts necessary to a decision of this appeal have been stated in the Martin case, and the decision in that case is determinative of the principal issues presented here.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martin v. California Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Calistoga National Bank v. Calistoga Vineyard Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Daniel v. . Commissioners of EdgecombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- Miles v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. PrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Fletcher v. A. J. Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Benner v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.