Legal Opinion
Sayles v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 23, 1943No. Civ. 13879PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J. pro tem.
The defendant county of Los Angeles appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in an action to recover taxes paid under protest. The appeal is presented on the judgment roll alone. The facts herein stated appear from the findings. At all material times, the plaintiff here was the owner of an ocean-going tug named “Eskimo” and was a resident of Ketchikan, in the Territory of Alaska, and the tug was registered at the same-place. On November 14, 1938, plaintiff chartered this tug to Philip R. Park, Inc. (referred to herein as “Park”), a corporation, whose principal place of business…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Old Dominion Steamship Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Ayer & Lord Co. v. Commonwealth of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Scandinavian Airlines System, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Banner Metals, Inc. v. LockwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Fort v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Dennis v. City of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Bruce v. BruceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.