Legal Opinion
United States Lighting Service Inc. v. Llerrad Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 3, 1990No. C89-315PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BATTISTI, District Judge.
Before discovery sheds more light on this alleged malfunctioning product, two pending motions must be addressed. In this diversity action, Defendant Llerrad Corporation (“Llerrad”) has filed, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), a Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Defendant Underwriters Laboratory (“Underwriters”) has separately filed a Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff U.S. Lighting Service, Inc. (“U.S. Lighting”) has opposed both motions. For the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pfeiffer v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- State of Minnesota v. Jerry Expose, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- United States Lighting Service, Inc. v. Llerrad Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
- United States Lighting Service, Inc. v. Llerrad CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992