Legal Opinion

Pfeiffer v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 2, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-2359-OPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EARL E. O’CONNOR, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the court on the motion of defendant Eagle Manufacturing Company (hereinafter “Eagle Manufacturing”) for summary judgment. Defendant contends that its product, a gasoline can, was not defective as a matter of law because it complied with administrative regulatory safety standards in designing and manufacturing the can. Eagle Manufacturing claims it had no duty to warn plaintiff, because any danger associated with use of its product was open and obvious. Defendant also alleges that plaintiff, Zack Pfeiffer (hereinafter…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Wheeler v. John Deere Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alsup v. 3-Day Blinds, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
  2. House v. Armour of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  3. Miller v. Lee Apparel Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  4. Dea Richter v. Limax International, Inc., Lmx-Manufactures Consultants, Inc., Dea Richter v. Limax International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Duffee Ex Rel. Thornton v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API