Legal Opinion
Gibbs v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 9, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2012-1388PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Muhammed Gibbs, Elmer Crisco and Emiliano Crisostomo (“Plaintiffs”) have filed suit against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA” or “Defendant”) alleging discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s [22] Motion for Summary Judgment. Upon consideration of the pleadings, 1 the applicable authorities, and the record as a whole, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant’s motion. Specifically, the…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clemmons v. Academy for Educational Development, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Njang v. Whitestone Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Ames v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Dunbar v. FoxxDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Abdelhamid v. Lane Construction CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.