Legal Opinion
People v. Curtis T.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 19, 1989No. D008848PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
Curtis T. admitted an allegation he possessed stereo equipment with obliterated serial numbers in violation of Penal Code section 537e and was declared a ward of the court. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 1 § 602.) On appeal, Curtis contends the court erred in denying his suppression motion.
Facts
On May 3, 1988, a petition was filed alleging Curtis had unlawfully possessed cocaine. He was placed on home supervision pursuant to a home supervision agreement signed by Curtis and his mother. On Friday, May 13, 1989, Assistant Deputy Probation Officer Charlotte Welch, who was assigned to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- People v. BravoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. MontenegroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Arredondo, California Court of Appeal, 6th District2016
- People v. StokesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. Quinones CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2015