Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bicandi v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1935No. 6037Published

1Dissent

BUDGE, J.,

Dissenting. — The material allegations of the complaint in this action may be stated concisely as follows: That appellant is a corporation; that it owns and operates a sawmill and lumber plant near the town of Emmett; that upon its property is located a pond constructed and maintained by it for the purpose of holding logs thereon during the opteration of its mill; that this property was fenced upon three sides; that a number of paths led from the highway to the property of appellant and that at one point, where several paths joined, the lower portions of the pickets of the fence had…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Herbert v. WaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Barnhart v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Waite v. Shoemaker & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Milner v. Earl Fruit Co. of the NorthwestIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API