Pelella v. Pelella
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.
Defendant moves under rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint in this action for the malicious prosecution of a divorce action upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
In substance the complaint states that the plaintiff is the husband of the defendant; that his wife “ maliciously and without probable cause ’ ’ instituted a suit in the State of Georgia in April, 1957 for absolute divorce against him; that in the Georgia proceeding the wife ‘ knowingly, wilfully and maliciously, and with intent to defraud the plaintiff and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Porter v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Dixie Broadcasting Corp. v. RiversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Coleman v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Mitchell v. Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Joseph A. Weiss v. Emerich HunnaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Sonia F. Alland v. Consumers Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Libra Bank Ltd. v. Banco Nacional De Costa Rica, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- In Re EWI, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
- Diamond v. Mutual Life InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973