Dixie Broadcasting Corp. v. Rivers
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
*105Candler, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Headnotes 1, 2, 3, and 4 do not require elaboration.
The pleader does not characterize his action. He simply sets forth facts upon which he relies for recovery; and, if these facts are such as in law entitle the plaintiff to recover, it is not necessary that the action should be classified or characterized by any name. In this case the plaintiff complains of a proceeding the defendants filed against him with the Federal Communications Commission. There are various forms of action to which resort may be had to recover for an injury sustained…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Porter v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Coleman v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Mitchell v. Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Hardy v. VialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Reverend W. Eugene Scott, Phd. v. Joel RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Davis v. Board of Educ. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- O'NEAL v. Home Town Bank of Villa RicaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.