Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Allen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 1, 1888PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Malicious Prosecution. Probable Cause. Words and Phrases. Charge of Court. Malice. Damages. Mortgages. Criminal Law. Evidence. Practice in Supreme Court. Before Judge Harris. City Court of Macon. March Term, 1887. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

Allen mortgaged to Coleman & Newsom a mule and a one-horse wagon. Newsom died, and Coleman, as surviving partner, foreclosed the mortgage. A mortgage fi. fa. was issued; search was made for the property, and it was not found. Certain information came to Coleman indicating that the property had been disposed of by Allen. Coleman took the advice of counsel learned in the law and, thereupon, made the requisite affidavit to impute an offence under §4600 of the code, charging that the property had been fraudulently disposed of, procured a. war*640rant for the arrest of Allen,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad v. HomerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Birchard v. BoothWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Central Railroad v. SennSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  4. Dailey v. HoustonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. Bennett v. HydeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Chapman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Hicks v. BrantleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Dixie Broadcasting Corp. v. RiversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Sanfrantello v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API