Legal Opinion
Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 25, 2001No. Nos. 99-CV-79, 99-CV-80PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*424ORDER
2Per curiam
On consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the response thereto, it is
ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is
FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted solely as to the question whether appellant was required to provide appellee with notice pursuant to D.C.Code § 12-309 or the WASA statute, D.C.Code § 43-1672(b). Accordingly the opinion and judgment of February 15,…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
4Cited by3 opinions
- JAIYEOLA v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water and Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water and Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002