Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Friedman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 1992No. 3135PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

This is a Commonwealth appeal from an order of the lower court granting a suppression motion. 1 A statement made by appellee and videotapes taken from her apartment were suppressed after the Honorable Juanita Kidd Stout found that the investigating officers violated appellee's rights as guaranteed by the fourth, fifth, sixth, and fourteenth amendments to the U.S. Constitution. After the conduct of an evidentiary hearing, Judge Stout determined that the statement made by appellee at police headquarters was the product of custodial interrogation and that appellee did not…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GarvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Com. v. Desrivieres, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. IannelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. IannelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API