Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Green

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 29, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

In this appeal we address whether the circumstances of appellant’s custodial interrogation violated Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), where appellant was not specifically informed of the crime about which he was questioned. We find appellant’s rights under Miranda were not violated and therefore we affirm.

Appellant was found guilty of first degree murder and sentenced to death. On direct appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, his judgment of sentence was reversed and a new trial was granted.1 At the second trial, appellant was again found…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Com. v. Newnam, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Com. v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. Com. v. Smith, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API