Commonwealth v. Green
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
In this appeal we address whether the circumstances of appellant’s custodial interrogation violated Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), where appellant was not specifically informed of the crime about which he was questioned. We find appellant’s rights under Miranda were not violated and therefore we affirm.
Appellant was found guilty of first degree murder and sentenced to death. On direct appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, his judgment of sentence was reversed and a new trial was granted.1 At the second trial, appellant was again found…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Com. v. Newnam, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Com. v. Smith, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022