Commonwealth v. Iannelli
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentMcEWEN, Judge
The author of the majority opinion has provided a perceptive and persuasive expression of position, but I am obliged to differ somewhat with that view. I do concur in the result of Section 1(A) of the majority opinion, since I believe that this Court is possessed of original jurisdiction to issue orders authorizing the interception of wire and electronic communications. I am constrained, however, to dissent from the holding of the majority on the issue of the constitutionality of the search warrants executed on January 27, 1990, because I would find that the warrants, authorizing the seizure…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In the Matter of the Application of Lafayette Academy, Inc., Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.