Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pamplona

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 30, 2003No. 01-P-1331PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrasso, J.

A jury found the defendant guilty of assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon (two counts) and assault and battery. The defendant, who served as his own counsel throughout most of the trial, contends that his convictions should be reversed because (1) he did not make a knowing, intelligent, *240and voluntary waiver of counsel; and (2) the judge erred in not giving an unrequested lesser included offense instruction. We affirm.

1. Waiver of counsel. The judge first learned of the defendant’s dissatisfaction with defense counsel after the jury had been selected and the Commonwealth had…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Ronald Maynard v. Larry MeachumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. BerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. BrittoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MeansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. PenaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. ClemensMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. MullenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. CoteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API