Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cote

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 29, 2009No. 08-P-624PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.

On May 5, 2003, the defendant was arraigned on one count of negligent operation of a motor vehicle, G. L. c. 90, § 24(2)(a). At that arraignment, the presiding judge informed *710the defendant that because he would not face any jail time for this misdemeanor, he was not eligible to receive appointed counsel. The defendant appeared pro se at his November 4, 2003, jury trial. That same day, the jury found the defendant guilty, and he was sentenced to one year of probation.1 The defendant, represented by counsel, subsequently filed a motion for a new trial, which was denied. The defendant now…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. BarnesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. MeansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  5. United States v. Frederick W. BauerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FahertyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. HempelMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2026
  3. Doe, SORB No. 6969 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API