Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Means

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 12, 2009PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.

We consider whether, conformably with the constitutionally guaranteed right to assistance of counsel in a criminal case,1 a defendant may be held to have forfeited his right to counsel at trial by reason of his wrongful behavior (doctrine of forfeiture), a novel issue in Massachusetts. Cf. United States v. Leggett, 162 F.3d 237, 249-251 (3d Cir. 1998), cert, denied, 528 U.S. 868 (1999) (defendant forfeited right to counsel at sentencing hearing by physically attacking counsel). If so, we consider whether the trial judge properly invoked the doctrine of forfeiture in this case.

During the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ForteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. PenaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. State of Tennessee v. Tommy HolmesTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. KrauseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API