Pickern v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
HUG, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
The mandate issued on May 8, 2006 is hereby recalled. The request to publish the unpublished Memorandum disposition is granted. The Memorandum disposition filed April 14, 2006, is withdrawn and replaced with an opinion authored by Judge Hug.
OPINION
Brenda Piekern appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants/appellees Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc. and Siegmund Weinstock Family Trust (collectively “the Appellees”). In granting summary judgment, the district court held that the Appellees had no obli gation under Title III of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Andrew H.K. Wong v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Kathleen Lentini v. California Center for the Arts, Escondido Alan Corbin Randy Vogel, and Does 1-10Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Navellier v. SlettenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- In Re H. Frank Dominguez, Debtor. H. Frank Dominguez v. David D. Miller Denyse M. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by227 opinions
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Doran v. 7-Eleven, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Navajo Nation v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- David Updike v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
222 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.