Andrew H.K. Wong v. Regents of the University of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The majority opinion filed on August 18, 2004, is amended as follows:
At 379 F.3d at 1108, replace the first sentence of the paragraph which begins “Regarding the activity of learning ...,” with the following:
Regarding the activity of learning, Wong’s claim to be “disabled” was contradicted by his ability to achieve academic success, and to do so without special accommodations.
At 379 F.3d at 1108-09, replace the paragraph which begins on page 1108 and extends to the next page…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by315 opinions
- Pickern v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Charles Yeager v. Connie BowlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Hoffman v. Construction Protective Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Walton v. U.S. Marshals ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Tokai Corp. v. Easton Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
310 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.