Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Martinez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided May 12, 2004No. 10-03-00128-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1ConcurrenceTom Gray, Chief Justice

This Court abated this appeal to require compliance with Sowels. 1 Martinez v. State, 135 S.W.3d 233 (Tex.App.-Waco, 2004, order) withdrawn, April 22, 2004. I dissented. Id. (Gray, C.J., dissenting). In response to the abatement order, the State, not the defendant, filed a motion to reconsider. The Court granted the motion for reconsideration and withdrew its earlier abatement order. I heartily concurred in the withdrawal of the abatement order, and agreed to issue the order of withdrawal before I had completed a concurring opinion, so as to cut off the need for the hearing previously ordered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Sowels v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  3. In the Interest of E.L.Y.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. McMahon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Darrell Ferguson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2014
  2. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  3. Mike Arthur Hartsell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
  4. Mike Arthur Hartsell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
  5. Perryman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API