Ferguson v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1ConcurrenceTom Gray, Chief Justice
Today, we return to a well-worn path; the minimum procedure required for compliance with the constitutional mandate of the assistance of counsel, sometimes referred to as an Anders procedure. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1976). I have long contended that the precedent of this Court required more procedure than was necessary. Beckett v. State, 166 S.W.3d 752 (Tex.App.-Waco 2005, order) (Gray, C.J., concurring); Fewins v. State, 166 S.W.3d 751 (Tex.App.-Waco 2005, order) (Gray, C.J., concurring); Perryman v. State, 159 S.W.3d 778 (Tex.App.-Waco 2005,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- In the Interest of E.L.Y.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Villanueva v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.