Legal Opinion

Roesler v. Farmland Foods & Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1989No. 88-1082PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, the plaintiff-appellant employee, Arlene Roesler, claims her award against the defendant-appellee employer, Farmland Foods, and its insurance carrier, defendant-appellee Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, is inadequate. She more specifically assigns as error the compensation court’s failure to award (1) more temporary total disability benefits, (2) greater permanent partial disability benefits, and (3) a waiting penalty and attorney fees. Each of the assignments of error being without merit, we affirm.

Resolution of the issues presented by the assignments of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harpham v. General Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Gloria v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Quinn v. Archbishop Bergan Mercy HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Musil v. J.A. Baldwin Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Grammer v. Endicott Clay ProductsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. McMichael v. Lancaster County School District 001Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bronzynski v. Model Electric, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API