Roesler v. Farmland Foods & Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.
In this workers’ compensation case, the plaintiff-appellant employee, Arlene Roesler, claims her award against the defendant-appellee employer, Farmland Foods, and its insurance carrier, defendant-appellee Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, is inadequate. She more specifically assigns as error the compensation court’s failure to award (1) more temporary total disability benefits, (2) greater permanent partial disability benefits, and (3) a waiting penalty and attorney fees. Each of the assignments of error being without merit, we affirm.
Resolution of the issues presented by the assignments of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harpham v. General Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Gloria v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Quinn v. Archbishop Bergan Mercy HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- Musil v. J.A. Baldwin Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Grammer v. Endicott Clay ProductsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- McMichael v. Lancaster County School District 001Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Bronzynski v. Model Electric, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2005